| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mountain Goat

Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 6095 Location: Leysin, Alpes Vaudoises, Switzerland
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alan, I'm really sorry to disappoint you, but all our XpPro installations (7, or counting the woodle's pet food calorie counter dedicated laptop, 8 in total) are running SP2 and none are pirate. You may find pirate XpPro an oxymoron.
Out of the 70 millions users, I gather, from a quick scan via Google and the tech forums, that I am not alone, apologies - I meant to say 69,999,999 users - I wouldn't want to include you.
If you're feeling bored, perhaps drop your post into one of the geek forums? You may find a flak jacket useful.
MG _________________ HolidayPad - Site of the Year / Leysin Chalet Rental |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jimbo

Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 3097 Location: Perigord noir
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
We still run Windows 2000 Pro on two of our workstations (because our expert says the platform is more stable than XP or Vista) and I was worried that AVG8 might not be compatible. However, it downloaded successfully on both and automatically kicked out 7.5. But I wonder how much longer we will be able to use friendly and reliable old 2000.
Jim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mountain Goat

Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 6095 Location: Leysin, Alpes Vaudoises, Switzerland
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Same feelings about friendly and reliable Windows NT - ran a network for years without the slightest blip - solid as a rock. Does it still exist?
MG _________________ HolidayPad - Site of the Year / Leysin Chalet Rental |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alan Knighting

Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Posts: 4170 Location: Monflanquin, Lot-et-Garonne, France
|
Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mountain Goat wrote: | Alan, I'm really sorry to disappoint you, but all our XpPro installations (7, or counting the woodle's pet food calorie counter dedicated laptop, 8 in total) are running SP2 and none are pirate. You may find pirate XpPro an oxymoron.
Out of the 70 millions users, I gather, from a quick scan via Google and the tech forums, that I am not alone, apologies - I meant to say 69,999,999 users - I wouldn't want to include you.
If you're feeling bored, perhaps drop your post into one of the geek forums? You may find a flak jacket useful.
MG |
Margaret,
I was stating a fact, not making an accusation. Rather than being disappointed I am delighted to hear the good news about your copies of XP.
I know some people have reported problems and I admit I’ve only updated AVG on 3 PC’s, 1 XP Pro and 2 XP Home. Once I had upgraded to SP2 AVG v8 installed on all 3 with no problems at all. I think I’ll leave the geek forums to the geeks.
| Mountain Goat wrote: | Same feelings about friendly and reliable Windows NT - ran a network for years without the slightest blip - solid as a rock. Does it still exist?
MG |
I too used to run a network. It was actually a mixed network of networks; DEC PDP11’s running RSTS, DEC Vax’s running VMS, Intel boxes running Unix & Xenix and PC’s running Novel Netware. It could be a nightmare to maintain but by far the most reliable were those running Unix and Xenix.
I think NT still lives, to an extent. Aren’t Windows 2000, XP and Vista based on the technology of the NT engine?
Alan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alan Knighting

Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Posts: 4170 Location: Monflanquin, Lot-et-Garonne, France
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apologies to Margaret,
I think my last message should have been addressed to Richard or Jenny although I’m not sure which one is MG.
Alan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mountain Goat

Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 6095 Location: Leysin, Alpes Vaudoises, Switzerland
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Having upgraded and done a full drive check with AVG 8.0 I'm the proud owner of 1,800 cookies on one of our laptops, 1,200 on another.
Before I find a way of zapping them, surely there are good cookies and evil cookies and should I best leave alone?
MG _________________ HolidayPad - Site of the Year / Leysin Chalet Rental |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alan Knighting

Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Posts: 4170 Location: Monflanquin, Lot-et-Garonne, France
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mountain Goat wrote: | Having upgraded and done a full drive check with AVG 8.0 I'm the proud owner of 1,800 cookies on one of our laptops, 1,200 on another.
Before I find a way of zapping them, surely there are good cookies and evil cookies and should I best leave alone?
MG |
You have two alternatives. You could zap them all and approve them again as and when they come up or you could assume you already have a clean system in which case you should leave them alone. It's entirely up to you.
Alan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vrooje

Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 3229 Location: Burgundy, France
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I approve/reject all new cookies/cookie-setting sites as they come up, and I currently have cookies from 65 different sites (most of which set multiple cookies). I force most of them to be session cookies and I clear them regularly anyway, and it does me no harm.
The only cookie I don't like to clear is the one set by Lay My Hat that allows me to stay logged in to the forum at all times.
MG, I'd say you're probably fine as-is. If you want to do as I do, it will take some getting used to (the constant requests for cookies), but it is very enlightening. _________________ Brooke |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alan Knighting

Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Posts: 4170 Location: Monflanquin, Lot-et-Garonne, France
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Brooke,
As is the case with many things, proper cookie control can be an eye-opener but don’t many people need their eyes opened about many things?
Alan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mountain Goat

Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 6095 Location: Leysin, Alpes Vaudoises, Switzerland
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Many thanks for the advice.
Brooke, re:
The only cookie I don't like to clear is the one set by Lay My Hat that allows me to stay logged in to the forum at all times.
I find the login drops after 30mins or so - is that a function of LMH's inner workings, Paolo's preference or my browser (Firefox)?
MG _________________ HolidayPad - Site of the Year / Leysin Chalet Rental |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vrooje

Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 3229 Location: Burgundy, France
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you check the box to keep you logged in at all times, the forum shouldn't log you off. If it does that, it's probably a preference in your browser that forces LMH's cookies to be session cookies, or something else in your settings that forces sessions to expire after 30 minutes (if it's that regular). _________________ Brooke |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marks
Joined: 06 Nov 2006 Posts: 1598 Location: Costa Blanca
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| www.ccleaner.com/ is a good way to manage cookies. You chose to include or exclude and when you run the cleaner those you don't want are removed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jimbo

Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 3097 Location: Perigord noir
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've got nearly 1600 cookies on my main workstation. If I zapped all of those, is the worst that could happen as a result that it'll take me longer to access those sites again? Do any of these cookies have a more sinister motive? And would my machine be noticeably better for their removal?
Jim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mountain Goat

Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 6095 Location: Leysin, Alpes Vaudoises, Switzerland
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Brooke and others.
So, following up on Jimbo's question, which to delete and which to keep and what are the downsides of deleting?
MG _________________ HolidayPad - Site of the Year / Leysin Chalet Rental |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alan Knighting

Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Posts: 4170 Location: Monflanquin, Lot-et-Garonne, France
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jimbo wrote: | I've got nearly 1600 cookies on my main workstation. If I zapped all of those, is the worst that could happen as a result that it'll take me longer to access those sites again? Do any of these cookies have a more sinister motive? And would my machine be noticeably better for their removal?
Jim |
Jim,
If you delete them all each one will simply reappear when you next visit the sites which use them. Most cookies are simply tracking devices but one or two are more sinister; within your browser you can block or allow cookies for specific websites. They just use up a little space on your HD of which you probably have more than enough.
Alan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|