Uh oh....now someone is in trouble.....
Brian has made the classic mistake of treating a factual documentary as if it's fictional drama. Film making is a language, and he's used the wrong one, which is frowned upon in the industry. That's why people go to film school. Folks who do book this villa will feel betrayed and mislead when they find out. If he's lucky, they won't sue. And find out they will, because the CA-for-Philippines shots are not sufficiently generic in nature to get away with it, they are shot too wide. I watched it again, and picked up a few problem areas:
1. The coastline with buildings is clearly visible, especially in the walking shot. Since it's not a James Bond movie, where anything goes, documentary convention would require a subtitle over that to say "California" , or it is understood to be the location that is being described. That's a no no in the language of documentary film making.
2. "Come to the Philippines" implies the narrator is there, otherwise it would be "Go to the Philippines". Again, this would be OK in a drama setting, or as a voice over narration, but is unacceptable where the narrator is in a clearly visible landscape.
3. The girl hanging off a rock ready to jump into the water while talking about the beautiful waters of the Philippines implies this is a photo of a girl in that location.
I'm fine with the interwoven stock photos of animal, bike, masseuse. These are all generic in nature.
I sense that what I am looking at here is a product from a technician who knows how to press buttons, but does not have the benefit of any professional production training. That would be fine is he hadn't crossed a major boundary line. It's extremely controversial to make a "Docudrama" in any situation, but for a vacation rental, which is basically tourism, it's pretty scary that anyone would even think it's acceptable to do this.
For video editing software, I recommend Windows Movie Maker as a very good place to start. It comes as standard on many PCs these days, you may even have it and not realize. You can certainly do everything that Brian has done here, and a lot more besides, it's really surprisingly good. My only criticism is that it can't handle high def, but for websites, that's not really an issue anyway.
For players to embed in a website, I use youtube of course, also I like Splashcast.net, both free. My camera is about as close to professional quality as you can get, but at home movie price - around $800. It's a Canon HV 20 and it shoots High Definition wide screen. The quality is amazing.
Finally, I notice that Brian did learn something here though....his sky is now blue, although it does look rather fake, which fits right in with the overall style.