Ju wrote:
On the plus side - no need to worry about whether the two groups will get on.
Sometimes too well! We've let the big 4-bedroomed barn as a package with either the two- or the three-bedroomed gites on a number of occasions this year. In theory, it's a great idea and seems to offer advantages to the owner. In practice, big groups tend to monopolise the common areas like the pool to the detriment of the unfortunate families in the remaining gite who get a bit pushed out. Big groups are noisier, cause more damage, are less likely to own up to breakages and supervise their children less well (if at all!). And they often seem 'helpless' when confronted with small problems which I can't believe would faze them at home - one group couldn't work out how to move a dead rat from their lawn ('we couldn't think what to do'), so were eating their barbeque with the rat for company (whiffing nicely after a day in the sunshine) when I returned.
I'm sure that it's the 'big group' thing. A bunch of people (unless they have a natural leader) who get together for a short time, don't really have any rules. They're on holiday, relaxing, having fun and nobody wants to take responsibility and be seen as a party pooper, so discipline goes out of the window. In our experience, families and small parties keep a much firmer hand on the tiller.
This doesn't mean that we're against big parties in principle but we would now impose additional T+C's on them. And I would clearly identify the 'group leader' in advance for liaison purposes.
Jim